Researchers Discovered That Various Species Share a Similar Mechanism of Molecular Response to Nanoparticles
Living organisms are exposed to nanoparticles through different products and air pollution every day. After examining hundreds of exposures, researchers at Tampere University revealed how various species share a specific epigenetic molecular response to particulate matter. They have now explained the mechanism through which cells and organisms adapt to long-term exposures to nano-sized materials.
Researchers at FHAIVE – Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches, Tampere University, have discovered a new response mechanism specific to exposure to nanoparticles that is common to multiple species. By analysing a large collection of datasets concerning the molecular response to nanomaterials, Doctoral Researcher Giusy del Giudice has revealed an ancestral epigenetic mechanism of defence that explains how different species, from humans to simpler creatures, adapt over time to this type of exposure.
The results of the research coordinated by Dario Greco, Professor of Bioinformatics of the Faculty of Medicine and Health Technologies and Director of FHAIVE, are presented in the scientific article An Ancestral Molecular Response to Nanomaterial Particulates, recently published on the prestigious journal Nature Nanotechnology.
“We have demonstrated for the first time that there is a specific response to nanoparticles, and it is interlinked to their nano-properties. This study sheds light on how various species respond to particulate matters in a similar manner. It proposes a solution to the one-chemical-one-signature problem, currently limiting the use of toxicogenomic in chemical safety assessment,” Dario Greco says.
Linking nanoparticles and immunity
The implications of this study go beyond the field of toxicology. The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the importance of immune activation in predicting the clinical outcome of a viral infection. In more polluted areas, COVID-19 had a more severe impact on the human population.
“Our results uncover an important link between understanding the basic defence mechanisms in living organisms and their immune functions”, Greco points out.
“When it comes to drugs or viruses, we have understood that any exposure or infection leaves a trace on our immune system, and that this trace will affect the way we respond to future agents. Now, we have evidence that even particulate matter primes our immunity,” says Giusy del Giudice, the first author of the scientific publication.
The detrimental effects of air pollution on respiratory functions have been long known, but only recently scientists from The Francis Crick Institute proved it to be among the driving causes of lung cancer in non-smokers. In both cases, COVID-19 and lung cancer, the impact of particulate on the immune system contributed to these effects.
“The association between particulate matter and immune activation is of utmost importance and may lead to crucial epidemiological implications,” del Giudice says.
A step closer to planetary health
Another important lesson learned from the COVID-19 pandemic concerns the concept of planetary health: all living organisms on the Earth are interconnected, and the effects on one specie will eventually propagate to others. In this regard, the results of this study open also new avenues to formulate integrated models that predict the effects of chemical exposures on many species at a time.
“Our results move in this direction by describing fundamental defence mechanisms common to many species throughout the tree of life”, del Giudice says.
Nanotechnology plays an important part in many fields, from biomedicine to energy and climate. Engineered nanomaterials are chemical substances or materials with particle sizes just between 1 to 100 nanometres, one third of a human hair.
Currently, thousands of consumer products contain nanomaterials, which requires testing their possible health and environmental effects. Because traditional toxicology relies on animal or in vitro tests to monitor phenotypic changes in response to exposures, it cannot keep in pace with this technological development.
“We cannot test every new nanomaterial on every possible species on Earth. We need innovative ways to reliably assess possible dangerous products as quickly as possible. Scientific evidence such as the one generated in this study can help to develop new models that do not require large amounts of animal experiments,” Greco says.
This research was carried out within the EU project NanoSolveIT that establishes computational models to test environmental health and safety of engineered nanomaterials.
Read the original article on Tampere University.