Date17th, Oct 2022

Summary:

Despite the efficiency of chemotherapy in treating primary tumors, it may induce undesirable metastasis because of proinflammatory factors being released from impaired cells, upregulating inflammatory reactions.

Full text:

Despite the efficiency of chemotherapy in treating primary tumors, it may induce undesirable metastasis because of proinflammatory factors being released from impaired cells, upregulating inflammatory reactions.

Nanocarriers Inhibit Metastasis in Breast Cancer Mouse Model

Study: Therapeutic Nanocarriers Inhibit Chemotherapy-Induced Breast Cancer MetastasisImage Credit: Design_Cells/Shutterstock.com

An article published in Advanced Science presented polymeric nanoparticles that can concurrently scavenge proinflammatory factors and deliver chemotherapeutics to inhibit chemotherapy-induced metastatic breast cancer.

Structures and characterization of the PAMAM dendrimer derivatives. A) Top: Chemical structures of the PAMAM derivatives tested initially. Bottom: Structure of G3-C125-DEEA20, which was selected after additional optimization for the preparation of the nanoparticles. “NP+” is used as an abbreviation for these cationic nanoparticles. B) Heatmap of the Z scores for the different attributes of the PAMAM derivatives. Higher Z scores (blue) indicate better cell viability, DNA binding, or TLR3/8/9 inhibition. C) DNA-binding efficiency of different PAMAM derivatives and G3-C125-DEEA20 nanoparticles at different polymer:DNA mass ratios. D–F) TLR3/8/9 activation assays showing inhibition of nucleic acid agonist-induced TLR activation by the nanomaterials (polymers or nanoparticles). The DNA agonist used to activate HEK-Blue hTLR cells is listed at the top of each panel. The mass ratio of nanomaterials to agonist was 2:1. G,H) IL-6 and TNF-a levels released by RAW 264.7 cells treated with the agonist ODN BW006 with or without the addition of nanomaterials. Comparisons were made with the agonist only group.

Figure 1. Structures and characterization of the PAMAM dendrimer derivatives. A) Top: Chemical structures of the PAMAM derivatives tested initially. Bottom: Structure of G3-C125-DEEA20, which was selected after additional optimization for the preparation of the nanoparticles. “NP+” is used as an abbreviation for these cationic nanoparticles. B) Heatmap of the Z scores for the different attributes of the PAMAM derivatives. Higher Z scores (blue) indicate better cell viability, DNA binding, or TLR3/8/9 inhibition. C) DNA-binding efficiency of different PAMAM derivatives and G3-C125-DEEA20 nanoparticles at different polymer:DNA mass ratios. D–F) TLR3/8/9 activation assays showing inhibition of nucleic acid agonist-induced TLR activation by the nanomaterials (polymers or nanoparticles). The DNA agonist used to activate HEK-Blue hTLR cells is listed at the top of each panel. The mass ratio of nanomaterials to agonist was 2:1. G,H) IL-6 and TNF-α levels released by RAW 264.7 cells treated with the agonist ODN BW006 with or without the addition of nanomaterials. Comparisons were made with the agonist only group. *p 

Source: